Product Comparison

STH-3 vs STH-3A vs STH-5: Complete KHT Heat Seal Tester Model Comparison

All three KHT STH heat seal testers comply with ASTM F88 and F2029. The difference lies in gradient capability, data output, and interface. Here's the complete side-by-side breakdown.

At a Glance: Key Differences Between STH-3, STH-3A, and STH-5

STH-3 (Manual): Single-point, manual dial control, no data logging — the ASTM F88 workhorse at the lowest price. STH-3A (Digital Gradient): 5-position gradient, digital LED display, manual records — the R&D and film qualification tool most labs should start with. STH-5 (Touchscreen IoT): Programmable profiles, automatic data logging, USB/LAN export — the production and pharma/battery standard.

STH-3 Deep Dive: When the Manual Entry-Level Model Is Enough

The STH-3 is the right choice when: (1) your testing involves verifying a single, known production parameter — not discovering what that parameter should be; (2) your test volume is low (fewer than 20 cycles/day); (3) paper records are acceptable; (4) budget is the primary constraint. For pharmaceutical QA labs running ISO 11607 incoming material inspection at a fixed validated temperature, the STH-3 is often perfectly adequate.

STH-3A Deep Dive: Why Most Labs Choose the 5-Position Gradient Model

The STH-3A is recommended for: (1) any lab performing film qualification, SIT determination, or seal window mapping; (2) labs qualifying incoming material batches where lot-to-lot variation is expected; (3) R&D teams developing new packaging formats; (4) packaging labs that need to generate seal curve data for regulatory submissions or customer qualifications. The 5-position gradient capability typically represents 70–80% time savings per seal curve compared to sequential single-point testing.

STH-5 Deep Dive: IoT Integration and Touchscreen for Production Environments

The STH-5 is designed for: (1) pharmaceutical production labs with 21 CFR Part 11 electronic records requirements; (2) battery cell lines requiring parameter-locked profiles and automated data output; (3) facilities with multiple operators requiring role-based access to test profiles; (4) labs integrating seal test data into LIMS or ERP systems. The touchscreen interface reduces operator-induced variation by eliminating manual dial settings.

Decision Matrix: Match Your Lab Profile to the Right Model

R&D / Film qualification lab → STH-3A. Small QC lab, known parameters → STH-3. Pharmaceutical production, FDA-regulated → STH-5. Battery manufacturer, production line → STH-3A or STH-5. Food factory, SIT mapping → STH-3A. Contract lab, multiple clients → STH-3A or STH-5 (depends on data logging needs).

Ready to Apply This in Your Lab?

Tell us your packaging material and testing standard — we'll recommend the right KHT STH model.

Get a Quote →

Frequently Asked Questions

Questions About Heat Seal Testing?

Our engineers answer specification, compliance, and selection questions. Factory-direct pricing, 24-hour response.

Contact KHT Instrument
STH-3 vs STH-3A vs STH-5: Which KHT Heat Seal Tester Is Right for You? | KHT Instrument